Disruptive Protests and a Steadily Eroding Public Image
The melodious opening night of the BBC Proms was rudely interrupted last Friday by ‘Just Stop Oil’ protesters wielding confetti cannons and air horns. A striking demonstration against what they perceive as the BBC’s insufficient coverage of climate change. Their audacious attempts to address the Royal Albert Hall’s audience, although met with boos, have pushed the spotlight onto Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s standoffish approach towards the group’s increasingly provocative activities.
In recent months, ‘Just Stop Oil‘ has become a recurring nuisance, with their signature disruptive protests also erupting at Wimbledon and Chelsea Flower Show. These actions have polarized public opinion, with some denouncing their methods while others defend their cause. The essential question, however, as raised by The Bournemouth Observer, is can Sunak continue to dismiss ‘Just Stop Oil’? Or is it time for him to engage them?
Sunak’s Hardline Stance: A Double-edged Sword?
Earlier this year, the Prime Minister introduced the Public Order Act 2023, which granted expanded powers to police in England and Wales to disperse protesters disrupting transport, with potential jail time of up to three years for tunnelling. Labelled by the Home Office as targeting a “selfish minority,” the legislation sparked widespread criticism from those who saw it as a direct assault on the right to protest.
Interestingly, Sunak’s explicit targeting of Labour last month, dismissing them as a ‘Just Stop Oil’ splinter group in his think tank speech, has only served to amplify the group’s visibility and possibly their influence. His decision to mock opposition leader Keir Starmer’s proposal to block new North Sea drilling seems to have inadvertently reinforced ‘Just Stop Oil’s’ relevance in the climate conversation.
Protests Under the Spotlight: An Unintended Victory?
Despite Sunak’s dismissive stance, the heightened media coverage and public attention ‘Just Stop Oil’ continues to draw presents a compelling argument for their success. Their disruptive yet peaceful protests appear to be shifting the narrative, reaffirming a 15-year analysis of world protests that direct action can significantly impact debates and bring issues to the global political agenda.
While critics argue that the methods of ‘Just Stop Oil’ may be extreme, there are numerous ways in which the steady stream of peaceful, disruptive protests can exert substantial pressure on any government. These include damaging public image, creating a perception of political instability, causing economic pressure, questioning the government’s legitimacy, and potentially prompting policy changes.
In the face of the turbulent current political climate and an already fragile public image due to allegations of sleaze and economic mismanagement, the government might be increasingly vulnerable to these pressures.
With the upcoming elections next year predicted to be a defeat for the Conservatives, the question remains whether Sunak can afford to keep sidestepping ‘Just Stop Oil’. His current approach seems to be backfiring, inadvertently amplifying the group’s cause and threatening to erode his administration’s standing further. Only time will tell if he chooses to revise his stance and engage in a productive dialogue or continues to ignore the growing clamour for a more committed stance on climate action.
Your Climate Compass: Environmental News by The Bournemouth Observer.