The State of Dietary Disparity
Despite the incessant buzz around healthy living and eating, it seems the most vulnerable in society are forcibly excluded from this health-conscious bandwagon. The current socioeconomic structure, which perpetuates a growing health inequality, is distressingly biased in favour of those in higher income brackets. This unfortunate reality has been emphatically highlighted in the latest report by The Broken Plate.
In a world where banking behemoth HSBC boasted profits of £16.9 billion and British Gas unveiled a staggering nearly £1 billion profit in the first half of 2023 alone, the burden of health inequality seems even more profound.
Price and Affordability: A Matter of Income and Food Costs
An examination of the price and affordability of a healthy diet is illuminating. Shockingly, the most deprived fifth of the UK population would have to expend 50% of their disposable income to meet the costs of a government-recommended healthy diet, a figure that is a mere 11% for the least deprived fifth.
Healthier food options tend to be over twice as expensive per calorie as their unhealthy counterparts, further complicating the matter for those with limited means. Even more distressingly, more sustainable plant-based alternatives to chicken, an essential dietary staple for many, are about 27% pricier.
To address this inequality, the government must ensure that everyone has a sufficient income to afford a healthy diet. This includes rebalancing food costs, ensuring that healthier options are the most affordable, and removing price barriers to more sustainable and healthy food choices.
Availability: Access and Choice on the High Street
In terms of availability, it’s startling that one in four food outlets on the high street are fast-food joints, notorious for their unhealthy offerings. Additionally, availability of low sugar options in key children’s food categories is alarmingly limited, with only 7% of breakfast cereals and 8% of yoghurts targeted towards children being low in sugar.
The actions needed to redress this imbalance are clear. Local authority planning powers must be used to curb the unchecked proliferation of unhealthy fast-food outlets. Simultaneously, food manufacturers must be pressured to reformulate products with excessive sugar content and desist from marketing unhealthy food to impressionable children.
The Misleading Lure of Marketing
The appeal of unhealthy foods is substantially boosted by manipulative marketing techniques. A whopping 97% of snacks targeted towards babies and toddlers boast a nutritional or health claim on their packaging, despite being high in sugar for this age group. A substantial 33% of food and drink advertising spend is on confectionery, snacks, desserts, and soft drinks, dwarfing the meagre 1% allocated to fruit and vegetables.
To combat this, advertising spend on healthy foods must be increased, while that on unhealthy foods should be judiciously decreased. Food businesses should be encouraged to boost sales of healthy and sustainable foods, and transparency around their offerings must be increased.
Bridging the Dietary Divide: Towards an Equitable and Healthy Tomorrow
In a world where mammoth profits continue to be reported by corporations, it is profoundly distressing that a healthy lifestyle remains elusive for many, largely due to systemic biases. The recommendations proposed by The Broken Plate shine a light on potential solutions, which, if implemented, could help bridge this dietary divide and ensure the possibility of a healthier life for all, irrespective of socio-economic standing.
Breaking down complex finance topics with The Bournemouth Observer.